(c) any agreement to purchase goods in instalments (whether the payments are designated in the agreement as rent or otherwise) if the seller or any person other than the lessee or his surety retains or is entitled to repossess the goods or to induce the lessee to: lose ownership of the goods; and the difference between the lease and an HPA is that the lease will never own the bonded property in the whole bailout business. The bailout may take place for various purposes, such as the retention or profitable sale of the business, in which the purpose of the surety is terminated at the request of the Bailors. In an HPA, the rented object can be owned by the tenant as soon as the HPA fee is fully paid. The Supreme Court struck down the impugned clause because „the nature of the sale under the Sale of Goods Act is that the property must pass from the seller to the buyer when a contract of sale is concluded, except in the case of a conditional sale. [9] Therefore, any legislation of the state legislature that enters into an agreement or transaction in which the property does not pass from the seller to the buyer would be outside its legislative jurisdiction. [10] Statement I [contested clause] is to clarify that a lease is considered a sale, although the property is not transferred from the seller to the buyer at the time of such an agreement. [11] All agreements contain certain standard clauses, including, but not limited to, We can add that non-registration did not invalidate the agreement or the result that the company is reimbursed all the money it paid under the agreement. . . .