A statement was drafted with a summary, but not the agreement itself. This may be due, to some extent, to the secrecy of the SFA, SPL and SFL, but at least the lack of a full publication is not desirable for an atmosphere of honesty, openness and trust to cut into the current air, like the spring sun, which speaks of our beautiful game. The simple truth Adam, no one knows what to believe. That`s why we speculate, we do research and we wonder! This leads to mistrust and division. The governing bodies of our football should not even think about making secret deals with anyone! Are we innocent, naïve children destined to be protected from the horrors of the adult world, or are they moving poles for the good of a team? Perhaps you could explain to me a situation that requires this degree of secrecy. footballtaxhavens.wordpress.com/2013/08/03/time-for-Rangers-to-challenge-the-illegal-sfa-spl-agreement/ The „previous agreements between the club and the SFA“ probably refer to the five-way agreement between Rangers, Sevco, the SFA, the SPL and the SFL. This agreement attempted to isolate the new company from certain activities of the last majority owner of the Oldco Rangers, Craig Whyte – known as the „CW Exempt Acts“. Part of this deal was, of course, to forfeit the prize money for the club`s second-place spot in the 2011/12 season, a sum that had yet to be paid to Oldco under SPL rules. Do we think this is a balanced agreement or does anyone think that either we have benefited from it or that it has hindered our progress? It should hinder RFC and allow all the rewards and ££to help the dark side. The worst deal ever and the dark side would have always demanded new penalties against the Rangers. I think there are more than 5 ways in the agreement. It`s more like that: one potato, two potatoes, three potatoes, four; Five potatoes, six potatoes, seven potatoes, more! So, at the end of the day, this potato will take care of Sevco? www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=one%20potato%20two%20potato&source=web&cd=4&cad=rja&sqi=2&ved=0CEMQFjAD&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.onepotatotwopotato.tv%2F&ei=zrINUbbQOYLwkAX5qIGIDg&usg=AFQjCNFA2mDC1xSuaky0pmgq1vG652MJqg&bvm=bv.41867550,d.dGI.

And most importantly, the SFA breached all confidentiality conditions by disclosing, even if only partially, this part of the agreement (Am I correct, Paul?) Can anyone give a brief silly summary of what the five-way deal is/was and why it was corrupt? I am not a legal expert. .