Pronoun verbs have a reflexive pronoun that refers to the subject, and this reflexive pronoun represents either the direct object or the indirect object of the verb. Here is the tricky part: the agreement is only necessary if the reflexive pronoun is a direct object; if it is indirect, there is no agreement. So to know if current participants need to agree, you need to determine the function of the reflexive prognosis. That`s how it works. But the verbs have to be approved in a very specific construction: the participatory past must agree with the direct object if the verb moves forward. 5) For semi-auxiliary verbs, there is no correspondence with the direct object, because the object always belongs to the infinitive, not the semi-auxiliary object. However, there is still the possibility of a direct opposition agreement in accordance with point 31.2 above. Did you see Romain`s new bike? This is it. [„Roman`s new motorcycle“ is the direct object; in the first sentence, it does not conform to the verb; in the second sentence, the personal pronoun „the“ is the direct object that replaces „Roman`s new motorcycle“; the old „bought“ stake therefore agrees with it.] [Who/what is washed? –> „hands.“ „Hands“ is the direct object and is placed according to the verb, disagree.] Of course, if the noun is replaced by an object pronoun, this pronoun is always direct and the reflexive pronoun is always indirect, so there is no agreement with it.

However, as the direct object precedes the verb, past participation is subject to a direct object agreement. If there is a direct object that is the recipient of the action, then the rules of the agreement are the same as to have: the past participant agrees with the direct object when placed in front of the verb and does not accept if placed after. For some verbs, the Past Participant must agree on sex and number, either with the subject or with the subject of the sentence. This agreement is necessary in the following situations: [Who/what is cleared?-> „They“. The subject is therefore the recipient of the appeal, there is consensus.] The rules of agreement of past participants are different.